Accreditation Commission

      The Faculty Accreditation Commission supports teacher education programmes in meeting accreditation standards, coordinates working groups, manages evidence and monitoring processes, and evaluates continuous improvement activities.

      Commission Members Duties and Responsibilities Annual Work Plan Meeting Decisions
      View Members (28) +
      Duties and Responsibilities
      1. Plan and coordinate preparatory activities at Faculty and programme levels in accordance with programme accreditation standards.
      2. Allocate duties among working groups and evaluate the reports, forms, data and evidence they prepare.
      3. Support the monitoring of programme objectives, programme outcomes, course learning outcomes, and measurement and evaluation processes.
      4. Ensure the participation of students, academic staff, graduates, placement schools and other stakeholders in the accreditation process.
      5. Coordinate the preparation of the self-evaluation report and its appendices, and the organisation and archiving of evidence.
      6. Identify areas for development based on monitoring results and submit improvement proposals to the Dean’s Office.
      7. Monitor the implementation of decisions and link their outcomes to the relevant quality processes.
      Annual Work Plan
      January – February
      Planned Activity: Evaluate the previous year’s activities and update requirements relating to standards and evidence.
      Responsible: Commission leadership and working groups
      Expected Output: Annual priorities and a list of evidence requirements
      March – April
      Planned Activity: Establish working groups, ensure student participation, conduct needs analyses and administer evaluation forms.
      Responsible: Commission and working groups
      Expected Output: Duty allocations, analyses, forms and implementation records
      May – June
      Planned Activity: Evaluate student competencies, learning environments, stakeholder data and programme-specific accreditation status.
      Responsible: Commission and relevant academic and administrative units
      Expected Output: Datasets, evaluation results and improvement proposals
      July – August
      Planned Activity: Organise evidence, identify gaps and prepare for the new academic year.
      Responsible: Coordination team and working groups
      Expected Output: Updated evidence archive and preparation plan
      September – October
      Planned Activity: Conduct activities relating to orientation, course evaluation, programme outcomes and stakeholder participation.
      Responsible: Commission, academic divisions and student representatives
      Expected Output: Attendance records, evaluation results and monitoring records
      November – December
      Planned Activity: Evaluate annual activities, working group outcomes and improvement measures.
      Responsible: Commission and relevant units
      Expected Output: Annual evaluation summary and work plan for the following year
      Meeting Decisions
      The records below are publicly available summaries of Accreditation Commission decisions, prepared with personal data and internal correspondence details removed. Official documents are retained in the records of the Dean’s Office.
      Meeting Date: 17.03.2026 | Decisions: 03, 04, 07, 08, 09 and 10
      • It was decided that Commission members would serve two-year terms and that appointments would be monitored by their start and end dates.
      • It was agreed that members unable to attend meetings would submit their reasons in writing and that attendance would be monitored.
      • It was decided to appoint a student member to the Commission and student representatives to the working groups.
      • It was decided to administer a student feedback form evaluating teaching activities before the midterm examinations.
      • It was decided to use a student course evaluation form to monitor the alignment of courses with programme outcomes and learning outcomes.
      • It was agreed to use a standard attendance record at academic division orientation meetings for newly enrolled students.
      Meeting Date: 15.04.2026 | Decisions: 01–06
      • Needs analyses and work package tables relating to the facilities, students and academic staff working groups were reviewed.
      • It was decided to submit the draft Working Procedures and Principles of the Faculty Accreditation Commission to the Unit Quality Commission for its opinion.
      • It was decided to recommend to the Dean’s Office the inclusion of relevant academic representatives in the Commission to support jointly conducted faculty–school cooperation activities.
      • It was agreed to select student representatives from among the members of the Student Quality Commission.
      • It was decided to monitor attendance at Commission meetings and the submission of written reasons for absence.
      • It was decided to determine the date and time of the next meeting.
      Meeting Date: 14.05.2026 | Decision: 01
      It was decided to obtain data for monitoring students’ academic, professional and social development from the relevant units, and to ensure that the collected data also include academic division or programme information.
      Last Updated: 02.09.2026