Evaluation of action plans prepared following meetings between department heads and students, the draft DİMER Operating Procedures and Principles, and other matters relating to quality processes.

• It was decided to communicate needs identified through student feedback regarding physical facilities, security, the library, technical infrastructure, healthcare services and information provision to the relevant units.
• It was decided to publish accreditation syllabi on the faculty website and identify classroom requirements for elective courses.
• An integrated data system, classroom technology infrastructure, quality culture training, assessment and examination directives, academic development, alumni tracking and faculty–school cooperation were identified as areas of work for 2026.
• Working groups were established for the 2025 Unit Self-Evaluation Report.
• It was decided to update the faculty's mission, vision and objectives in line with the strategic plan, conduct a SWOT analysis using stakeholder input and submit the DİMER draft to the Faculty Board.

Evaluation of psychological counselling services, building accessibility activities, the DİMER draft, the course allocation form, reports from meetings with students and administrative staff, and other matters relating to quality processes.

• It was decided to introduce psychological counselling services to students during academic advising and orientation meetings.
• It was decided to work with the relevant units to address deficiencies identified during the building accessibility inspection.
• It was agreed to revise the DİMER draft and use the laboratory and smartboard request section of the course allocation form throughout the faculty.
• It was decided to prepare departmental action plans for issues identified during meetings between department heads and students and monitor the outcomes of the meeting between the Dean and administrative staff.
• It was decided to collect the data required for the 2025 annual activity report from the relevant academic and administrative units.

Review of previous meeting decisions, work on the Plan–Do–Check–Act (PDCA) Record Form and other matters relating to quality processes.

• It was decided that faculty commissions would document their completed PDCA cycles in the record form and submit them to the Dean's Office.
• It was decided to organise a separate student meeting to identify the requests and concerns of students with special needs.
• It was decided to hold and report on meetings between department heads and students during the ninth week of the academic term.
• The meeting between the Dean and administrative staff was planned for the tenth week, and the meeting between the Dean and students for the eleventh week.
• It was decided to strengthen management coordination in commission meetings and base assignments at division level on board decisions.

Discussion of the evaluation report on the meeting between the Rector and students and other matters relating to quality processes.

• It was decided to explain double major, minor and summer school opportunities to students during academic board, orientation and advising meetings.
• It was decided to monitor external stakeholder project calls for technical visits and report on activities carried out.
• It was decided to notify the relevant units of improvement needs concerning practical training workshops, vending machine services, the heating system and door and window maintenance.
• Representation and coordination assignments were made between the Quality Commission and other commissions, and representation of departments and divisions on commissions was adopted.
• It was decided to update the Student Quality Commission with attention to year-group representation and ensure that student members participate in division meetings.
• It was decided to forward commission decisions to the Quality Coordination Office, prepare an evidence collection schedule and update the Assessment and Evaluation Commission based on expertise.